Changpeng Zhao, also known as CZ, is the founder and CEO of Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. In a recent interview with a leading financial media outlet, CZ expressed his concern about banks’ risk to fiat-backed stablecoins. He emphasized that banks have the power to freeze or seize funds, and stablecoins backed by fiat currencies are not immune to such actions. In this article, we will discuss CZ’s views on the risk that banks represent to stablecoins, the potential effect of this risk on the cryptocurrency market, and the measures that stablecoin issuers can take to mitigate these risks.
What Are Stablecoins?
Stablecoins are digital currencies designed to keep a stable value close to a particular asset or basket, such as fiat currencies, commodities, or cryptocurrencies. Stablecoins can be classified into three broad categories: fiat-backed stablecoins, commodity-backed stablecoins, and crypto-backed stablecoins.
Fiat-backed stablecoins are pegged to a fiat currency, such as the US dollar, and are backed by the issuer’s reserves. For example, Tether (USDT), is the largest stablecoin by market capitalization. It is pegged to the US dollar and supported by resources of US dollars held by Tether Limited.
Why are Banks a Risk to Fiat-backed Stablecoins?
Changpeng Zhao believes banks represent a risk to fiat-backed stablecoins because they can freeze or seize funds in bank accounts. In the case of stablecoins, these bank accounts have the reserves that back the stablecoin. If a bank were to freeze or seize these funds, the stablecoin issuer would be unable to redeem the stablecoins for their underlying assets. It leads to a loss of confidence in the stablecoin and potentially causes its value to collapse.
CZ pointed out that banks have a history of freezing or seizing funds. Even in cases where there is no evidence of illegal activity. For example, in 2019, the New York Attorney General accused Tether Limited of using reserves from affiliated entities to cover up to $850 million in losses. As a result, Tether’s bank accounts were frozen by a court order, preventing Tether from accessing the funds needed to redeem its stablecoins. Although Tether could unfreeze its accounts after a few weeks, the incident raised questions about the stability of fiat-backed stablecoins.
He also noted that stablecoin issuers typically hold their reserves in a small number of banks, which increases the concentration risk. If one of these banks were to fail or face financial difficulties, the stablecoin issuer could lose access to its reserves. Therefore, again leads to a loss of confidence in the stablecoin.
Impact of Bank Risk on the Cryptocurrency Market
The risk that banks pose to fiat-backed stablecoins could have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency market. Stablecoins are a crucial component of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, as they provide a stable unit of account that can be used for transactions and as a store of value. If investors lose confidence in stablecoins. they may be less willing to use them for transactions or hold them as a store of value. Which could guide a decline in demand for cryptocurrencies.
Moreover, the collapse of a stablecoin could trigger a chain reaction as investors rush to redeem their stablecoins for their underlying assets. Potentially causing a run on the reserves held by the stablecoin issuer. It could lead to a liquidity crisis in the cryptocurrency market. It is similar to the events that occurred during the collapse of Mt. Gox, a major cryptocurrency exchange, in 2014.
Measures to Mitigate Bank Risk
To mitigate the risk that banks pose to fiat-backed stablecoins. Changpeng Zhao suggested that stablecoin issuers hold their reserves in multiple banks and jurisdictions to diversify their risk. It would reduce the concentration risk and ensure that the stablecoin issuer has access to its reserves even if one of its banks fails or faces financial difficulties.
He also suggested that stablecoin issuers could consider using alternative forms of collateral, such as gold or other commodities, to back their stablecoins. It would reduce the reliance on banks and provide a more diversified and secure backing for the stablecoin.
Furthermore, Changpeng Zhao emphasized the importance of transparency and regulatory compliance for stablecoin issuers. By being transparent about their reserves and operations, stablecoin issuers can build trust and confidence among investors and regulators. Which can help mitigate the risk of bank freezes or seizures.
In conclusion, CZ’s warning about the risk banks pose to fiat-backed stablecoins highlights the need for stablecoin issuers to diversify their risk and adopt alternative forms of collateral. As stablecoins play an increasingly important role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Stablecoin issuers must take steps to ensure the stability and security of their coins. By doing so, they can help build trust and confidence among investors and regulators, which is crucial for the long-term growth and adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Read more: Bitcoin vs. Ethereum: Comparing Two Major Cryptocurrencies